The prisoner lays flat on his back, his chest is slightly caved in due to the strength of the straps tightened to his stomach. The officer of the main law stands with eager eyes. Can't wait for the passing im sure. The deserver shakes due to the immense white stress. His psychosis could be compared to A.M static.
Pale death now sits on the "examination" table. Officers of the main law stand round. What's the difference here honestly? The one who deserves to be put to death. Why? Did he kill someone? The officers of the main law when performing such an action, what makes them any different from the person their injecting, electrocuting, shooting, or hanging? Have they not just committed a murder themselves? The so-called deserver of the punishment wouldn't be dead unless the upholders of law didnt take his life so when that upholder goes where ever he goes after his shift i wonder if he realizes or even imagines himself a murderer.
Subject A murders old lady walking down street, takes her life...(and currency)
Subject A is caught and subjected to death row.
Seven years pass as Subject A waits for his impending fate.
Time comes...
Upholder B escorts Sub.A to death room.
Upholder B executes Subject A at scheduled time.
Executes- takes Sub. A's life
Not to say Sub.A didnt deserve such an act of oppresion,
but what makes Upholder B different from Sub. A when it comes to the
idea of taking anothers life ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment